Rimbaud and London


In 1873 Arthur Rimbaud wrote and published an extended poem in prose called A Season in Hell. He finished writing it after having spent time living in London, where he had a complicated homosexual love affair with fellow French poet Paul Verlaine. His time living in London was influential in his work because he was able to observe himself through the eyes of Verlaine, leading to a process of self-analysis rather than simply adopting an autobiographical style.
In the 1870’s certain areas of London became synonymous with debauchery and poverty which was exposed in Rimbaud’s writing style. It is here that he first encountered heavy alcoholism through gin and beer as well as drugs such as opium. This had an effect on his poetry in both the tone and the narrative comprehensibility. It was often difficult to understand what he was writing, even when one is sober. Rimbaud spoke of the derangement of the senses in order to truly find oneself and London was a place that easily facilitated these desires. He lived in Camden Town which was one of the poorer areas of the city with a low quality of life and he and Verlaine often struggled financially while living there. It is here that he started his ‘programme’ to escape from ordinary life, experiencing extreme degradation, starvation and exhaustion.
The section titled ‘Infernal Bridegroom’ in A Season in Hell is a clear allegorical reference to his relationship with Verlaine who was the ‘foolish virgin’. The auto biographer Robb has placed great emphasis on Rimbaud’s rented London room and the private space[1] that allowed them to explore a homosexual relationship that was otherwise illegal in the public space. It allowed them to live a ‘double life’ and assume a form of ‘double identity’ that was possible in London. They had an intense and volatile relationship as documented in the section and the private sphere allowed them to express the violent and sexual nature of their relationship which was further amplified because they were living together in a small and enclosed space. Verlaine and Rimbaud were described as engaging in private activities such as attempting to stab each other with knives[2] as a form of release from the frustration of their own lives. London gave them the freedom to be able to do these kinds of activities as well as maintaining their own privacy.
A Season in Hell transformed London into a place that defied social norms. It was a place that revealed in debauchery even though in the 19th Century it was becoming a city of central importance. However, much of his view of London is limited by his own personal experiences and is therefore subjective which suggests there is a limitation on the extent that his poetry was able to transform London for the readers. His poetry did not necessarily reflect the popular trends in the city because there was a limit on the aspects that had an effect on him. 


Bibliography:
Robb, Graham, ‘Rimbaud, Verlaine, and Their Season in Hell’, New England Review (1990), 21. 4, 7.


[1] Graham Robb, ‘Rimbaud, Verlaine, and Their Season in Hell’, New England Review (1990), 21. 4, 7-20 (p. 9).
[2] Ibid, P.9.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analyse and discuss the subversion of gender AND/OR racial hierarchies in Elena Garro’s short story ‘La culpa es de los Tlaxcaltecas’.

Discuss the representation of social and political conflict in Esteban Echeverría’s ‘El matadero’

Flor Silvestre is able to affirm the traditional values of the melodrama – the family and fatherland – at the same time that it affirms radical social changes’ (Mistron). Analyse and discuss the film in light of this comment, giving concrete examples to illustrate your answer.